<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Drinkingbird: You should care what your code looks like</title>
    <link>http://www.drinkingbird.net/blog/articles/2007/12/19/you-should-care-what-your-code-looks-like</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Random keyboard peckings</description>
    <item>
      <title>You should care what your code looks like</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The latest post over at Coding Horror, &lt;a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001022.html"&gt;&amp;#8220;Nobody Cares What Your Code Looks Like&amp;#8221;&lt;/a&gt; is one of the strange posts that pop up occasionally where it seems that Jeff Atwood has missed the point entirely.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The elegance/ugliness of the code behind an application is immensely important in the maintenance and extension of any software, and particularly for open source software where it&amp;#8217;s crucial that people &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; to work on your code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The mind boggles, really. Well, at least I got through that without making a jab at Jeff for his VB use.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:03:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:0e352b16-136a-4903-a091-bf36cfb5f0b5</guid>
      <author>Chris</author>
      <link>http://www.drinkingbird.net/blog/articles/2007/12/19/you-should-care-what-your-code-looks-like</link>
      <category>Ramblings</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
